Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs A4-5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
40.36
+4705%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 4705% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking248061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.49
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699
Current price$248 $758 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus supportno data64K (per core)
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm22x 71 mm (CCD) sq. mm + 121 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C47 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-160086x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8330AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5000 0.84
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 40.36
+4705%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 4705% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-5000 1295
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62424
+4720%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 4720% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5000 160
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2918
+1724%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 1724% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5000 480
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 19618
+3987%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 3987% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-5000 1207
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16551
+1272%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 1272% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5000 4165
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 138015
+3214%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 3214% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5000 2039
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 20279
+895%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 895% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-5000 38.2
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2.01
+1800%

A4-5000 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X3D by 1800% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-5000 1
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 65
+4264%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 4264% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5000 119
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 5974
+4920%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 4920% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5000 33
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 326
+888%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 888% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A4-5000 0.39
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 3.86
+890%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 890% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 0.9
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 26.9
+2824%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 2824% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 1078
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 15779
+1364%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 1364% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 9
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 266
+2945%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 2945% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 41
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 393
+850%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms A4-5000 by 850% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 40.36
Integrated graphics card 0.67 4.34
Recency 23 May 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5000 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5000
A4-5000
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 342 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1083 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5000 or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.