Processor N100 vs A4-3300M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads
0.77
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads
3.29
+327%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 327% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300M and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25231490
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Alder Lake-N
Release date14 June 2011 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128
Current price$61 no data

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.9 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480Gno data
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A4-3300M and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480GIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300M and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.77
Processor N100 3.29
+327%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by 327% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-3300M 1742
Processor N100 4869
+180%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by 180% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 3417
Processor N100 15207
+345%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by 345% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 1556
Processor N100 6435
+314%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by 314% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-3300M 40.2
Processor N100 15.91
+153%

A4-3300M outperforms Processor N100 by 153% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-3300M 1
Processor N100 5
+363%

Processor N100 outperforms A4-3300M by 363% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 3.29
Integrated graphics card 0.66 2.34
Recency 14 June 2011 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300M and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 98 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 743 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.