Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs A4-3300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
+82.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.41

A4-3300M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5800+ by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26712996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.030.44
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Brisbane (2007−2008)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm2126 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480Gno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.75
+82.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ 0.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3300M 1186
+81.6%
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ 653

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 0.41
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

A4-3300M has a 82.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-3300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-3300M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 111 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M or Athlon 64 X2 5800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.