Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs A4-1200
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ outperforms A4-1200 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3432 | 3378 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 2.22 | 0.31 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (12 years ago) | August 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-1200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | no data |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-1200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT3 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8180 (225 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 0.26 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 35 Watt |
A4-1200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 775% lower power consumption.
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, on the other hand, has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-1200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
