RSX-90nm vs Xenos Xenon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	Xenos Xenon	RSX-90nm
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	no data	no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	no data
Number of transistors	232 million	300 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	90 nm

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	N/A
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	N/A	ES 1.1
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---