Arc Pro A30M vs Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 Xe (2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameiDG1LPDEVDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2020 (4 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data128.0
Floating-point performanceno data4.096 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2020 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm

Arc Pro A30M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile and Arc Pro A30M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile
Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 3 votes

Rate Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.