Playstation 3 RSX 90nm vs Xbox One S GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameDurango 2RSX-CXD2953
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 November 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed914 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate43.8712.00
Floating-point processing power1.404 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGLN/AES 1.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 11 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 80 Watt

Xbox One S GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX 90nm, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One S GPU and Playstation 3 RSX 90nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 90nm
Playstation 3 RSX 90nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 174 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 42 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 90nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.