Arc A370M vs XGI Volari V5 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.75
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameXG41DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 September 2003 (22 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors90 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.40099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm

Arc A370M has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari V5 Ultra and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari V5 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari V5 Ultra
Volari V5 Ultra
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari V5 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about XGI Volari V5 Ultra or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.