GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1 vs Riva 128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNV3GK208B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1997 (28 years ago)27 March 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed100 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors4 million1,020 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate0.115.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs116
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data146 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W31x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 27 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 19 Watt

Riva 128 has 375% lower power consumption.

GT 710 PCIe x1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 59 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 44 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva 128 or GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.