Radeon Instinct MI300 vs ATI WinBoost

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameMach64Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 1995 (29 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14080
Core clock speed40 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors1 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs1no data
TMUsno data880
Tensor Coresno data880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOHBM3
Maximum RAM amount2 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed40 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 5 nm

Instinct MI300 has an age advantage of 27 years, a 6553500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 11900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between WinBoost and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that WinBoost is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI WinBoost
WinBoost
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.