GeForce 9200M vs ATI WinBoost

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.15
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameMach64C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 November 1995 (29 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed40 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed40 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 600 nm 65 nm

GeForce 9200M has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 823.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between WinBoost and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that WinBoost is a desktop card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI WinBoost
WinBoost
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate WinBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.