Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) vs VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | no data | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 January 2001 (23 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 64 |
| Boost clock speed | 121 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2001 | 4 January 2022 |
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) has an age advantage of 21 year.
We couldn't decide between VIA S3 Graphics ProSavage8 and Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
