UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs VIA Chrome9 HC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms Chrome9 HC by a whopping 17100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1567954
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.85
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameVN896Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332
Core clock speed1 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardno data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard12_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−322%
35−40
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Dota 2 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Dota 2 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3
−33.3%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 16−18

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 2−3

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 0−1 9−10

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
+0%
2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the VIA Chrome9 HC is 33% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • VIA Chrome9 HC performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) performs better in 20 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 1.72
Recency 1 March 2007 11 January 2021

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 17100% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 13 years.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 66 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.