UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs VIA Chrome9 HC

Chrome9 HC Chrome9HD
VS
(Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 32 EU) G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 24EUs Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms VIA Chrome9 HC by a whopping 18000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Chrome9 HC
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1544929
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.51
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameVN896Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332
Core clock speed1 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardno data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard12_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−322%
35−40
+322%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Dota 2 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Dota 2 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3
−33.3%
Valorant 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 18−20

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 4−5

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
+0%
2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 1
+0%
1
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the VIA Chrome9 HC is 33% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • VIA Chrome9 HC is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 20 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 1.81
Recency 1 March 2007 11 January 2021

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 18000% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 13 years.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Chrome9 HC
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
Chrome9 HC
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4860 Mobility Radeon HD 4860
GeForce4 4200 Go GeForce4 4200 Go
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
vs
R2 Graphics R2 Graphics
ATI Xpress 1100 Radeon Xpress 1100
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 Ti 4200
ATI Xpress 1100 Radeon Xpress 1100
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Orin Nano 8 GB
SIS Mirage 2 M760 Mirage 2 M760
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
ATI Mobility 128 M3 Mobility 128 M3
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
GTX 970M GTX 970M
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti
Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4150
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 65 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.