UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs VIA Chrome9 HC

VIA Chrome9 HC VIA Chrome9HD
VS
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms VIA Chrome9 HC by a whopping 19100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Chrome9 HC
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1518903
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.78
Architectureno dataGen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameVN896Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2007 (17 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores332
Core clock speed1 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz900 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardno data
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard12_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−83.3%
11
+83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
World of Tanks 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 12−14

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Valorant 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 0−1 2−3

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 5
+0%
5
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
+0%
2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 11
+0%
11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
World of Tanks 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 24 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 1.92
Recency 1 March 2007 11 January 2021

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 19100% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 13 years.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

VIA Chrome9 HC
Chrome9 HC
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Chrome9 HC
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4860 Mobility Radeon HD 4860
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
Chrome9 HC
vs
ATI Mobility X2500 Mobility Radeon X2500
GeForce4 4200 Go GeForce4 4200 Go
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
GeForce 7150M GeForce 7150M
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
vs
R2 Graphics R2 Graphics
ATI Xpress 1100 Radeon Xpress 1100
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200 Ti 4200
ATI Xpress 1100 Radeon Xpress 1100
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Orin Nano 8 GB
SIS Mirage 2 M760 Mirage 2 M760
vs
RTX 4090 RTX 4090
ATI Mobility 128 M3 Mobility 128 M3
vs
RTX A500 Mobile A500 Mobile
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
GTX 970M GTX 970M
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti
Pro WX 4150 Radeon Pro WX 4150
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 64 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.