UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs VIA Chrome9 HC
Aggregate performance score
We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) outperforms VIA Chrome9 HC by a whopping 17100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1526 | 910 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.65 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | VN896 | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2007 (18 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | onboard | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | onboard | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 8 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−58.3%
|
35−40
+58.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−375%
|
35−40
+375%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12
+71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−58.3%
|
35−40
+58.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
11
+57.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−58.3%
|
35−40
+58.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 16−18 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
+0%
|
1
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
+0%
|
1
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2
+0%
|
2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
+0%
|
1
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 19 tests (41%)
- there's a draw in 27 tests (59%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 1.72 |
| Recency | 1 March 2007 | 11 January 2021 |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 17100% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 13 years.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
