ATI Radeon 7200 vs 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8611580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.75no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameWestonR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (8 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed730 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1024 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate24.581
Floating-point processing power0.7864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs246
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 530 Samples: 615 1030
+51400%
ATI 7200 Samples: 1 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 10 no data
Fortnite 30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 36 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 30 no data
Far Cry 5 10 no data
Fortnite 13 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 28 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 23 Watt

Radeon 530 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 117.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 530 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 530 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 530
Radeon 530
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 780 votes

Rate Radeon 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 530 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.