ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs VIA Chrome9 HC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared VIA Chrome9 HC with Radeon HD 4650 AGP, including specs and performance data.

VIA Chrome9 HC
2007
0.01

HD 4650 AGP outperforms Chrome9 HC by a whopping 4800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15891300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.79
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVN896RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (19 years ago)10 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3320
Core clock speed1 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data514 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data48 Watt
Texture fill rateno data19.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeonboardDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXonboard10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

VIA Chrome9 HC 0.01
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.49
+4800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

VIA Chrome9 HC 4
Samples: 57
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207
+5075%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Valorant 21−24
−4683%
1100−1150
+4683%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Valorant 21−24
−4683%
1100−1150
+4683%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Valorant 21−24
−4683%
1100−1150
+4683%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.49
Recency 1 March 2007 10 September 2008

ATI HD 4650 AGP has a 4800% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.

Be aware that VIA Chrome9 HC is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 68 votes

Rate VIA Chrome9 HC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about VIA Chrome9 HC or Radeon HD 4650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.