RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking650not rated
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Power efficiency39.08no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568960
Core clock speed350 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00374.4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

UHD Graphics has 600% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8701 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.