RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
2022
6.41

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 959% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking59020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data78.13
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores648960
Core clock speedno data790 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data374.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−948%
220−230
+948%
1440p11
−900%
110−120
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Hogwarts Legacy 17
−959%
180−190
+959%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−33
−900%
300−310
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−900%
150−160
+900%
Far Cry 5 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Fortnite 40−45
−852%
400−450
+852%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Forza Horizon 5 25
−940%
260−270
+940%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
−900%
120−130
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−940%
260−270
+940%
Valorant 75−80
−900%
750−800
+900%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−33
−900%
300−310
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−929%
350−400
+929%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−936%
1150−1200
+936%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−900%
110−120
+900%
Dota 2 53
−938%
550−600
+938%
Far Cry 5 19
−953%
200−210
+953%
Fortnite 40−45
−852%
400−450
+852%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Forza Horizon 5 22
−945%
230−240
+945%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−900%
120−130
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Metro Exodus 11
−900%
110−120
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−940%
260−270
+940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−943%
240−250
+943%
Valorant 75−80
−900%
750−800
+900%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
−900%
300−310
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Dota 2 49
−920%
500−550
+920%
Far Cry 5 18
−956%
190−200
+956%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−940%
260−270
+940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−900%
110−120
+900%
Valorant 22
−945%
230−240
+945%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
−852%
400−450
+852%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−938%
550−600
+938%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−900%
60−65
+900%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%
Valorant 75−80
−939%
800−850
+939%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry 5 14
−900%
140−150
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−956%
190−200
+956%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Valorant 35−40
−900%
350−400
+900%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 24−27
−940%
260−270
+940%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

This is how UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 948% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 900% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.41 67.89
Recency 4 January 2022 11 August 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 959.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 523 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.