Quadro T1200 Mobile vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.60

T1200 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616300
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Power efficiency38.3974.12
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed350 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0091.20
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−263%
58
+263%
1440p9−10
−267%
33
+267%
4K21−24
−286%
81
+286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 263% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 286% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.60 19.46
Recency 11 January 2021 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 247.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6600 XT
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
T1000 T1000
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
T400 T400
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
T600 T600
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
CMP 70HX CMP 70HX
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 7229 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.