Quadro T1200 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 600

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.75

T1200 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 2127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1148305
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Power efficiency11.9073.59
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed200 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80091.20
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 600 0.75
T1200 Mobile 16.70
+2127%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 600 578
T1200 Mobile 14387
+2389%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 600 2189
T1200 Mobile 44135
+1916%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 600 433
T1200 Mobile 10134
+2240%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 600 3436
T1200 Mobile 50827
+1379%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−480%
58
+480%
1440p1
−3200%
33
+3200%
4K3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
Valorant 13
−969%
130−140
+969%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−918%
220−230
+918%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Dota 2 7
−1529%
114
+1529%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Valorant 11
−1164%
130−140
+1164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Dota 2 7
−1429%
107
+1429%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−750%
65−70
+750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
Valorant 30−33
−2067%
650−700
+2067%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−3200%
130−140
+3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2025%
170−180
+2025%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2200%
45−50
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
30−35
+120%
Valorant 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 480% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 3200% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 22 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 16.70
Recency 11 December 2017 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 18 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 260% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2126.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3732 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.