Quadro T1200 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.87

T1200 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 2134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1128285
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Power efficiency12.1375.28
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed200 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80091.20
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87
T1200 Mobile 19.44
+2134%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 600 578
T1200 Mobile 14387
+2389%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 600 2189
T1200 Mobile 44135
+1916%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 600 433
T1200 Mobile 10134
+2240%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 600 3436
T1200 Mobile 50827
+1379%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−480%
58
+480%
1440p1
−3200%
33
+3200%
4K3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Far Cry 5 0−1 65
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Hitman 3 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
−362%
60
+362%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−74.2%
54
+74.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Far Cry 5 0−1 59
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Hitman 3 5−6
−680%
35−40
+680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−327%
47
+327%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−633%
44
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−446%
71
+446%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−51.6%
47
+51.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Far Cry 5 0−1 56
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2067%
260−270
+2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−270%
37
+270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+63.2%
19
−63.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 20−22
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 10−11
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−12

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+0%
47
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+0%
28
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 480% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 3200% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 600 is 63% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 600 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 27 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 19.44
Recency 11 December 2017 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 18 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 260% lower power consumption.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2134.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3501 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 141 vote

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.