Radeon Pro V620 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324608
Core clock speed350 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data633.6
Floating-point processing powerno data20.28 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 4 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Pro V620 has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon Pro V620. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook card while Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
AMD Radeon Pro V620
Radeon Pro V620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.