Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and Radeon RX 6750 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6750 GRE outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 1311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 744 | 71 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 43.94 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.80 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake Xe | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 413.0 |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 18 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19
−1268%
| 260−270
+1268%
|
| 1440p | 15
−1300%
| 210−220
+1300%
|
| 4K | 10
−1300%
| 140−150
+1300%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 2.11 |
| 1440p | no data | 2.61 |
| 4K | no data | 3.92 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Elden Ring | 13
−1285%
|
180−190
+1285%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 15
−1300%
|
210−220
+1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Dota 2 | 12
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
| Elden Ring | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
−1275%
|
220−230
+1275%
|
| Fortnite | 18−20
−1268%
|
260−270
+1268%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
−1233%
|
400−450
+1233%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| World of Tanks | 55−60
−1279%
|
800−850
+1279%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Dota 2 | 32
−1306%
|
450−500
+1306%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−1289%
|
250−260
+1289%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 13
−1285%
|
180−190
+1285%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−33
−1233%
|
400−450
+1233%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Elden Ring | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−1204%
|
300−310
+1204%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| World of Tanks | 21−24
−1204%
|
300−310
+1204%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−1306%
|
450−500
+1306%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−1233%
|
80−85
+1233%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−1275%
|
220−230
+1275%
|
| Elden Ring | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−1275%
|
220−230
+1275%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−1275%
|
220−230
+1275%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Dota 2 | 12
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:
- RX 6750 GRE is 1268% faster in 1080p
- RX 6750 GRE is 1300% faster in 1440p
- RX 6750 GRE is 1300% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.30 | 46.55 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 17 October 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
RX 6750 GRE has a 1310.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
