Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.70
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.21
+479%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.64
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed350 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.70
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.21
+479%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+539%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+386%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+467%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 658
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+702%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−456%
100−110
+456%
1440p25
−460%
140−150
+460%
4K12
−442%
65−70
+442%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−450%
55−60
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Battlefield 5 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Far Cry 5 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Fortnite 24−27
−477%
150−160
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Battlefield 5 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−477%
450−500
+477%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Dota 2 36
−456%
200−210
+456%
Far Cry 5 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Fortnite 24−27
−477%
150−160
+477%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Dota 2 33
−476%
190−200
+476%
Far Cry 5 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−463%
45−50
+463%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−477%
150−160
+477%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−448%
170−180
+448%
Valorant 45−50
−463%
270−280
+463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Valorant 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 12
−442%
65−70
+442%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 456% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 460% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 442% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.70 27.21
Recency 11 May 2021 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 478.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.