GeForce Go 6100 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce Go 6100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 10750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 714 | 1552 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | C51MV |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 110 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 17 | -0−1 |
| 1440p | 30 | -0−1 |
| 4K | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 53 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 18 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 34 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 14 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+138%
|
24−27
−138%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80
+756%
|
9−10
−756%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 36
+414%
|
7−8
−414%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 13 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+138%
|
24−27
−138%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 15 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 33
+371%
|
7−8
−371%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+950%
|
2−3
−950%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+200%
|
6−7
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+138%
|
24−27
−138%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| Valorant | 21−24 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 950% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) surpassed Go 6100 in all 24 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.34 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 110 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 10750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
