Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs GeForce Go 6100
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1545 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | C51MV | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | DDR4 |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | DirectX 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 10 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6100 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
