UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	578	657
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.38	11.22
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	48
Core clock speed	350 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

21−24
+23.5%

−23.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
Elden Ring	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +71.4%	7 −71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +23.8%	21 −23.8%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Valorant	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Dota 2	21−24 +46.7%	15 −46.7%
Elden Ring	18−20 +80%	10 −80%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +31.8%	22 −31.8%
Fortnite	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +52.9%	17 −52.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +120%	10 −120%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Valorant	21−24 +75%	12 −75%
World of Tanks	100−110 +304%	25 −304%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Dota 2	21−24 −9.1%	24 +9.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +107%	14 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +62.5%	16 −62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +35.9%	35−40 −35.9%
Valorant	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Elden Ring	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +19.4%	30−35 −19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
World of Tanks	45−50 +39.4%	30−35 −39.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Valorant	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Elden Ring	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Fortnite	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Valorant	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is 24% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 304% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 9% faster.

All in all, in popular games: