Tesla M10 vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Tesla M10, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
5.89

M10 outperforms Graphics P630 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking645591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.242.43
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2018 (7 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192640 ×4
Core clock speed350 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8052.24 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs316 ×4
TMUs2440 ×4
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics P630 5.89
Tesla M10 7.10
+20.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
Tesla M10 2968
+20.4%
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Fortnite 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Valorant 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Dota 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Fortnite 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Dota 2 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Valorant 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Valorant 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.89 7.10
Recency 24 May 2018 18 May 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has a 21% higher aggregate performance score.

The Tesla M10 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 56 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics P630 or Tesla M10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.