Radeon Vega 7 vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	576	532
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Power efficiency	29.42	11.44
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	Cezanne
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	448
Core clock speed	350 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	53.20
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	8
TMUs	24	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−20 −27.8%	23 +27.8%
1440p	21−24 −19%	25 +19%
4K	12−14 −25%	15 +25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Elden Ring	16−18 +21.4%	14 −21.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −11.5%	29 +11.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −42.1%	27 +42.1%
Valorant	18−20 −52.6%	29 +52.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Dota 2	21−24 +29.4%	17 −29.4%
Elden Ring	16−18 +6.3%	16 −6.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.6%	28 −3.6%
Fortnite	35−40 −15.8%	40−45 +15.8%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +8.3%	24 −8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +15.2%	46 −15.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Valorant	18−20 +35.7%	14 −35.7%
World of Tanks	100−110 +74.1%	58 −74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Dota 2	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −13.8%	30−35 +13.8%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +23.8%	21 −23.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%
Valorant	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Elden Ring	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
World of Tanks	45−50 −17.4%	50−55 +17.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Valorant	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	1−2
Dota 2	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Elden Ring	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Fortnite	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Valorant	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

Vega 7 is 28% faster in 1080p
Vega 7 is 19% faster in 1440p
Vega 7 is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 74% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Vega 7 is 53% faster.

All in all, in popular games: