Radeon Pro 5500M vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	573	307
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.72	14.41
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1536
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	139.2
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	32
TMUs	24	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39

Pro 5500M 17.56
+175%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465

Pro 5500M 6774
+175%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 −211%	56 +211%
1440p	18−20 −200%	54 +200%
4K	9−10 −200%	27 +200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1300%

27−30
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Hitman 3	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −988%	85−90 +988%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Hitman 3	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −988%	85−90 +988%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −356%	40−45 +356%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1650%	35 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Hitman 3	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −988%	85−90 +988%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −333%	39 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	10−11
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35
+1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−700%

16
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75 +0%	75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	51 +0%	51 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	41 +0%	41 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	115 +0%	115 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

Pro 5500M is 211% faster in 1080p
Pro 5500M is 200% faster in 1440p
Pro 5500M is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5500M is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5500M is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.39	17.56
Recency	24 May 2018	13 November 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	85 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 466.7% lower power consumption.

Pro 5500M, on the other hand, has a 174.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.