GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	579	131
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.46	21.99
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	TU104B
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2560
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	220.8
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	64
TMUs	24	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−21 −561%	119 +561%
1440p	12−14 −525%	75 +525%
4K	7−8 −543%	45 +543%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −500%	75−80 +500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −395%	99 +395%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −500%	75−80 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −573%	170−180 +573%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −571%	90−95 +571%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −594%	111 +594%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −526%	119 +526%
Valorant	21−24 −719%	172 +719%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −500%	75−80 +500%
Dota 2	21−24 −486%	129 +486%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −190%	84 +190%
Fortnite	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −573%	170−180 +573%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −571%	90−95 +571%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −486%	129 +486%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −431%	85 +431%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −268%	190−200 +268%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −216%	60 +216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −540%	120−130 +540%
Valorant	21−24 −438%	113 +438%
World of Tanks	100−110 −176%	270−280 +176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −315%	83 +315%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −500%	75−80 +500%
Dota 2	21−24 −464%	124 +464%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −224%	90−95 +224%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −573%	170−180 +573%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −571%	90−95 +571%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −268%	190−200 +268%
Valorant	21−24 −676%	163 +676%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −857%	65−70 +857%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −857%	65−70 +857%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −373%	170−180 +373%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −660%	38 +660%
World of Tanks	45−50 −407%	230−240 +407%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −618%	79 +618%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −12.5%	35−40 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −500%	35−40 +500%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −808%	110−120 +808%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −767%	100−110 +767%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −578%	60−65 +578%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1013%	89 +1013%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −589%	60−65 +589%
Valorant	16−18 −594%	118 +594%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	35−40
Dota 2	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −550%	110−120 +550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −525%	25 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −820%	46 +820%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Dota 2	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −657%	50−55 +657%
Fortnite	6−7 −750%	50−55 +750%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Valorant	6−7 −933%	62 +933%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 561% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 525% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 543% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 1500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2070 Super Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics P630 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.41	36.58
Recency	24 May 2018	2 April 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	115 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 470.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.