FirePro W9100 vs UHD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with FirePro W9100, including specs and performance data.
W9100 outperforms Graphics P630 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 645 | 331 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 30.24 | 5.19 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Hawaii |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 May 2018 (7 years ago) | 26 March 2014 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2816 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 163.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 5.238 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 3 | 64 |
| TMUs | 24 | 176 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 275 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| StereoOutput3D | - | + |
| Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
| HD сomponent video output | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−204%
|
85−90
+204%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
−200%
|
30−33
+200%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−200%
|
75−80
+200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−204%
|
85−90
+204%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−189%
|
55−60
+189%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−196%
|
80−85
+196%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
−194%
|
50−55
+194%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−195%
|
65−70
+195%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−209%
|
210−220
+209%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−200%
|
75−80
+200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−204%
|
85−90
+204%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
−203%
|
300−310
+203%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
−206%
|
150−160
+206%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−189%
|
55−60
+189%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−196%
|
80−85
+196%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
−194%
|
50−55
+194%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−210%
|
65−70
+210%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−195%
|
65−70
+195%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−213%
|
50−55
+213%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−209%
|
210−220
+209%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−200%
|
75−80
+200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
−206%
|
150−160
+206%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−189%
|
55−60
+189%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−196%
|
80−85
+196%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−195%
|
65−70
+195%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−213%
|
50−55
+213%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−209%
|
210−220
+209%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
−206%
|
110−120
+206%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−204%
|
140−150
+204%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−189%
|
110−120
+189%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−203%
|
200−210
+203%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−200%
|
27−30
+200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−186%
|
40−45
+186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−200%
|
24−27
+200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−192%
|
35−40
+192%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−194%
|
50−55
+194%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−200%
|
90−95
+200%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−210%
|
65−70
+210%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−200%
|
27−30
+200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.89 | 18.53 |
| Recency | 24 May 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 750 Watt |
UHD Graphics P630 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 4900% lower power consumption.
FirePro W9100, on the other hand, has a 215% higher aggregate performance score.
The FirePro W9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W9100 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
