Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
2021
4 Watt
2.09

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by a whopping 2200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking89874
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data81.76
Power efficiency15.9222.89
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGen. 11Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242048
Core clock speed350 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data400.6
Floating-point processing powerno data25.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−2131%
290−300
+2131%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
God of War 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Fortnite 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
God of War 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Valorant 40−45
−2150%
900−950
+2150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−2109%
950−1000
+2109%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Dota 2 17
−1959%
350−400
+1959%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Fortnite 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
God of War 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Valorant 40−45
−2150%
900−950
+2150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Dota 2 16
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
God of War 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Valorant 40−45
−2150%
900−950
+2150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−2043%
450−500
+2043%
Valorant 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
God of War 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Valorant 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
God of War 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) and RX 9060 XT 16 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16 GB is 2131% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 48.08
Recency 11 January 2021 4 June 2025
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 160 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has 3900% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 2200.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 370 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.