ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 vs UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameLakefield GT1R300
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed200 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data110 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.600
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 37 Watt

UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 428.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) and FireGL 9700 X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) is a notebook card while FireGL 9700 X1-256 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256
FireGL 9700 X1-256

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.