Radeon 8040S vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 8040S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8040S outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 808 | 257 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 8.76 | 32.28 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) |
| GPU code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | Strix Halo |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 May 2019 (6 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-25 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 179.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13
−669%
| 100−110
+669%
|
| 4K | 9
−678%
| 70−75
+678%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 17
−694%
|
130−140
+694%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−767%
|
50−55
+767%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5
−860%
|
45−50
+860%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8
−1075%
|
90−95
+1075%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16
−744%
|
130−140
+744%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−767%
|
50−55
+767%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−863%
|
75−80
+863%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−687%
|
110−120
+687%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−527%
|
90−95
+527%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−971%
|
75−80
+971%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−500%
|
45−50
+500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−564%
|
90−95
+564%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−259%
|
160−170
+259%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−840%
|
90−95
+840%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4
−3275%
|
130−140
+3275%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30
−753%
|
250−260
+753%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−767%
|
50−55
+767%
|
| Dota 2 | 22
−673%
|
170−180
+673%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−863%
|
75−80
+863%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−687%
|
110−120
+687%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−527%
|
90−95
+527%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−971%
|
75−80
+971%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7
−1129%
|
85−90
+1129%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−500%
|
45−50
+500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2
−2500%
|
50−55
+2500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−564%
|
90−95
+564%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10
−610%
|
70−75
+610%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−259%
|
160−170
+259%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−840%
|
90−95
+840%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−767%
|
50−55
+767%
|
| Dota 2 | 20
−700%
|
160−170
+700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−863%
|
75−80
+863%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−527%
|
90−95
+527%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−500%
|
45−50
+500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−564%
|
90−95
+564%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−1320%
|
70−75
+1320%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−661%
|
350−400
+661%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16
−687%
|
110−120
+687%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−750%
|
50−55
+750%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−705%
|
160−170
+705%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−2050%
|
40−45
+2050%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−3100%
|
30−35
+3100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−700%
|
200−210
+700%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−648%
|
200−210
+648%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1050%
|
21−24
+1050%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−980%
|
50−55
+980%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−771%
|
60−65
+771%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4
−767%
|
24−27
+767%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−875%
|
35−40
+875%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−1040%
|
55−60
+1040%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−175%
|
40−45
+175%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−893%
|
130−140
+893%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| Dota 2 | 9
−678%
|
70−75
+678%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1300%
|
40−45
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−767%
|
24−27
+767%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 8040S compete in popular games:
- Radeon 8040S is 669% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 8040S is 678% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 8040S is 3275% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 8040S performs better in 52 tests (90%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.72 | 22.06 |
| Recency | 28 May 2019 | 6 January 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 55 Watt |
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 358.3% lower power consumption.
Radeon 8040S, on the other hand, has a 711% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 8040S is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
