Jetson Nano vs UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.20no data
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGen. 11GM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128
Core clock speed250 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.74
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) is a desktop card while Jetson Nano is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.