Radeon RX 6550M vs UHD Graphics 770

Place in the ranking	582	217
Place by popularity	31	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.38	21.62
Architecture	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Raptor Lake GT1	Navi 24
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	27 September 2022 (2 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1024
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	2840 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	181.8
Floating-point processing power	0.8448 TFLOPS	5.816 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	144.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Motherboard Dependent

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.17

RX 6550M 25.07
+306%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016

RX 6550M 9638
+849%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 770 16443

RX 6550M 20506
+24.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 770 3428

RX 6550M 14696
+329%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics 770 2655

RX 6550M 4546
+71.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −258%	68 +258%
1440p	5−6 −380%	24 +380%
4K	14 −293%	55−60 +293%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −279%	53 +279%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −325%	50−55 +325%
Elden Ring	16−18 −413%	80−85 +413%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −305%	75−80 +305%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −221%	45 +221%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −920%	50−55 +920%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −435%	123 +435%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −340%	65−70 +340%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Valorant	16 −531%	100−110 +531%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −305%	75−80 +305%
Counter-Strike 2	6 −483%	35 +483%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −325%	50−55 +325%
Dota 2	20 −330%	85−90 +330%
Elden Ring	11 −645%	80−85 +645%
Far Cry 5	30 −10%	33 +10%
Fortnite	35−40 −247%	120−130 +247%
Forza Horizon 4	18 −461%	101 +461%
Grand Theft Auto V	9 −856%	85−90 +856%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −340%	65−70 +340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −208%	150−160 +208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −326%	80−85 +326%
Valorant	18−20 −461%	100−110 +461%
World of Tanks	95−100 −163%	250−260 +163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −305%	75−80 +305%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	29 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −325%	50−55 +325%
Dota 2	40 −115%	85−90 +115%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −175%	75−80 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −450%	88 +450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −208%	150−160 +208%
Valorant	18−20 −461%	100−110 +461%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
Elden Ring	7−8 −529%	40−45 +529%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −373%	170−180 +373%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
World of Tanks	45−50 −269%	160−170 +269%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −462%	70−75 +462%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −570%	65−70 +570%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −613%	55−60 +613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
Valorant	16−18 −325%	65−70 +325%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −159%	40−45 +159%
Elden Ring	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −159%	40−45 +159%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −153%	40−45 +153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Dota 2	14 −214%	40−45 +214%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −371%	30−35 +371%
Fortnite	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Valorant	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RX 6550M compete in popular games:

RX 6550M is 258% faster in 1080p
RX 6550M is 380% faster in 1440p
RX 6550M is 293% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6550M is 920% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6550M is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.17	25.07
Recency	27 September 2022	4 January 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6550M, on the other hand, has a 306.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6550M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.