RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

UHD Graphics 770
2022
6.13

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 487% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking547126
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.27no data
ArchitectureAlder LakeAda Lovelace
GPU code nameAlder Lake xGno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$878 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324608
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate26.40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 770 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing Busno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speed1550 MHz16000 MHz
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.13
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 36.01
+487%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 487% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 770 16443
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 29411
+78.9%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 79% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 770 2738
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20908
+664%

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 664% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−459%
95−100
+459%
4K13
−477%
75−80
+477%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−483%
70−75
+483%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−477%
75−80
+477%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 17
−459%
95−100
+459%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Hitman 3 19
−479%
110−120
+479%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 16
−463%
90−95
+463%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
Hitman 3 8
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6
−483%
35−40
+483%
Metro Exodus 5
−440%
27−30
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−479%
110−120
+479%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Far Cry 5 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−471%
120−130
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−456%
50−55
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Hitman 3 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 459% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 477% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.13 36.01
Recency 4 January 2022 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 8 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1025 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.