Arc Pro A60 vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Arc Pro A60, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
5.37

Pro A60 outperforms Graphics 770 by a whopping 295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking633276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.8213.14
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)6 June 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40262.4
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 770 5.37
Arc Pro A60 21.21
+295%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 790
Samples: 2
Arc Pro A60 9378
+1087%
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−289%
70−75
+289%
4K13
−285%
50−55
+285%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
−285%
200−210
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
Hogwarts Legacy 11
−264%
40−45
+264%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−282%
130−140
+282%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry 5 17
−282%
65−70
+282%
Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 5 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Valorant 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 43
−272%
160−170
+272%
Far Cry 5 16
−275%
60−65
+275%
Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−275%
60−65
+275%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Metro Exodus 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Valorant 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 40
−275%
150−160
+275%
Far Cry 5 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Valorant 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Valorant 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Valorant 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Arc Pro A60 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro A60 is 289% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro A60 is 285% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.37 21.21
Recency 27 September 2022 6 June 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 766.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has a 295% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A60 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc Pro A60
Arc Pro A60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1406 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 770 or Arc Pro A60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.