RTX PRO 6000 vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking676not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.56no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25624064
Core clock speed300 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate20.801,810
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs16752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 750 and RTX PRO 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 409 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 750 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.