RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3090 with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3090
2020
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
66.98

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms RTX 3090 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.82no data
Power efficiency13.599.65
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA102GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1049624064
Core clock speed1395 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate556.01,810
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs112176
TMUs328752
Tensor Cores328752
Ray Tracing Cores82188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length336 mm304 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount24 GB96 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.510.1
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3090 66.98
RTX PRO 6000 81.52
+21.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 26650
RTX PRO 6000 32435
+21.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD192
−19.8%
230−240
+19.8%
1440p126
−19%
150−160
+19%
4K85
−17.6%
100−110
+17.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.81no data
1440p11.90no data
4K17.64no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 349
−14.6%
400−450
+14.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 209
−19.6%
250−260
+19.6%
Dead Island 2 355
−12.7%
400−450
+12.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 172
−16.3%
200−210
+16.3%
Counter-Strike 2 347
−15.3%
400−450
+15.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 178
−18%
210−220
+18%
Dead Island 2 348
−14.9%
400−450
+14.9%
Far Cry 5 208
−20.2%
250−260
+20.2%
Fortnite 300−350
−15.9%
350−400
+15.9%
Forza Horizon 4 254
−18.1%
300−310
+18.1%
Forza Horizon 5 210
−19%
250−260
+19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−19.3%
210−220
+19.3%
Valorant 350−400
−10.8%
400−450
+10.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 158
−20.3%
190−200
+20.3%
Counter-Strike 2 309
−13.3%
350−400
+13.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−7.9%
300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 154
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%
Dead Island 2 301
−16.3%
350−400
+16.3%
Dota 2 217
−19.8%
260−270
+19.8%
Far Cry 5 196
−17.3%
230−240
+17.3%
Fortnite 300−350
−15.9%
350−400
+15.9%
Forza Horizon 4 247
−21.5%
300−310
+21.5%
Forza Horizon 5 195
−17.9%
230−240
+17.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 171
−17%
200−210
+17%
Metro Exodus 176
−19.3%
210−220
+19.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−19.3%
210−220
+19.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 369
−8.4%
400−450
+8.4%
Valorant 350−400
−10.8%
400−450
+10.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 146
−16.4%
170−180
+16.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 136
−17.6%
160−170
+17.6%
Dead Island 2 228
−18.4%
270−280
+18.4%
Dota 2 213
−17.4%
250−260
+17.4%
Far Cry 5 183
−20.2%
220−230
+20.2%
Forza Horizon 4 217
−19.8%
260−270
+19.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−19.3%
210−220
+19.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
−20.9%
220−230
+20.9%
Valorant 296
−18.2%
350−400
+18.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
−15.9%
350−400
+15.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 231
−21.2%
280−290
+21.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
−21%
600−650
+21%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
−20%
180−190
+20%
Metro Exodus 115
−13%
130−140
+13%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−20%
210−220
+20%
Valorant 400−450
−13.1%
500−550
+13.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Dead Island 2 167
−19.8%
200−210
+19.8%
Far Cry 5 171
−17%
200−210
+17%
Forza Horizon 4 197
−16.8%
230−240
+16.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 153
−17.6%
180−190
+17.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
−19.2%
180−190
+19.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 59
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Dead Island 2 67
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 182
−20.9%
220−230
+20.9%
Metro Exodus 76
−18.4%
90−95
+18.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%
Valorant 300−350
−20.8%
400−450
+20.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 113
−15%
130−140
+15%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Dead Island 2 91
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Dota 2 202
−18.8%
240−250
+18.8%
Far Cry 5 108
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Forza Horizon 4 153
−17.6%
180−190
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%

This is how RTX 3090 and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 is 19% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 is 18% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.98 81.52
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 600 Watt

RTX 3090 has 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3090 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 79613 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 36 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3090 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.