RTX A400 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

UHD Graphics 710 Mobile UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
VS
A2 A2 PCIe A16 PCIe RTX A400 RTX A500 RTX A1000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
13.74

RTX A400 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
RTX A400 RTX A400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.3119.73
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speedno data727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Valorant 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+4.5%
110−120
−4.5%
Valorant 130−140
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and RTX A400 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 8% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.74 14.05
Recency 30 March 2021 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and RTX A400.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 5100
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Arc Pro A40 Arc Pro A40
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
Arc Pro A50 Arc Pro A50
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
Arc Pro A50 Arc Pro A50
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
Arc A310 Arc A310
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
Arc A310 Arc A310
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Arc A350 Arc A350
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.