Quadro NVS 110M vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with Quadro NVS 110M, including specs and performance data.
Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms 110M by a whopping 11291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 435 | 1510 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 64.14 | 0.85 |
| Architecture | no data | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | G72 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 June 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 7 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 112 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.200 |
| ROPs | no data | 2 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 4.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | no data | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+1700%
|
3−4
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+1680%
|
10−11
−1680%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
| Dota 2 | 27
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+1700%
|
3−4
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+560%
|
5−6
−560%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
| Dota 2 | 25
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+1700%
|
3−4
−1700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+560%
|
5−6
−560%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+363%
|
24−27
−363%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+10300%
|
1−2
−10300%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+13300%
|
1−2
−13300%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 65−70
+6800%
|
1−2
−6800%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 10300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed NVS 110M in all 30 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.53 | 0.11 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 1 June 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 11290.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
NVS 110M, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 110M in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 110M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
