GeForce Go 7600 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce Go 7600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
14.02
+4148%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Go 7600 by a whopping 4148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3781318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.11no data
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1G73
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data13
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data3.600
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry 5 9 0−1
Fortnite 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1308%
12−14
−1308%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Fortnite 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Dota 2 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Valorant 110−120
+331%
24−27
−331%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+5700%
2−3
−5700%
Valorant 130−140
+4533%
3−4
−4533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 5700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed Go 7600 in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.02 0.33
Recency 30 March 2021 1 March 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 4148.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
GeForce Go 7600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or GeForce Go 7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.