GeForce 9100M G vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce 9100M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms 9100M G by a whopping 7669% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 417 | 1451 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 62.81 | no data |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 10 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Sons of the Forest | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 110−120
+358%
|
24−27
−358%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+1367%
|
12−14
−1367%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 27
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+560%
|
5−6
−560%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+358%
|
24−27
−358%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 25
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+557%
|
7−8
−557%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+560%
|
5−6
−560%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+358%
|
24−27
−358%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 70−75 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+9500%
|
1−2
−9500%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
+5000%
|
2−3
−5000%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+13300%
|
1−2
−13300%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Sons of the Forest | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 65−70
+6800%
|
1−2
−6800%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 6800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed 9100M G in all 19 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.43 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 7668.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9100M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
