GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in performance ranking	722	823
Place by popularity	32	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.36	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 (2017)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	GK107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2017 (6 years ago)	8 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price	$457	$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1085 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.45	34.72
Floating-point performance	460.8 gflops	833.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	MXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.1.126
CUDA	no data	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	17 +70%	10−12 −70%
1440p	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
4K	7 +75%	4−5 −75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5
+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Hitman 3	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	3 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and GT 755M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 630 is 70% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 630 is 67% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics 630 is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.08	2.14
Recency	1 October 2017	8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt