GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in the ranking	763	864
Place by popularity	35	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.26	2.98
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Comet Lake GT2	GK107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2017 (7 years ago)	8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	184	384
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1085 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.45	34.72
Floating-point processing power	0.4232 TFLOPS	0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	16
TMUs	23	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 +60%	10−12 −60%
1440p	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
4K	7 +75%	4−5 −75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Elden Ring	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	13 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Metro Exodus	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +50%	6−7 −50%
Valorant	8 +60%	5−6 −60%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Dota 2	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Elden Ring	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	13 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Fortnite	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Valorant	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
World of Tanks	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Dota 2	19 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Far Cry 5	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Valorant	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Elden Ring	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
World of Tanks	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Valorant	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	7 +75%	4−5 −75%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Fortnite	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Valorant	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and GT 755M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 630 is 60% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 630 is 67% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics 630 is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.10	2.16
Recency	1 October 2017	8 November 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has a 43.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.