RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.86
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926144
Core clock speed350 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00299.5
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs380
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.