Ironlake vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking772not rated
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.75no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Generation 5.75
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2Ironlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (6 years ago)no data
Current price$706 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.60no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 620 and Ironlake compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & Cons Summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Ironlake. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while Ironlake is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
Intel Ironlake
Ironlake

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3786 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Ironlake on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.