HD Graphics 4600 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

UHD Graphics 620
2017
32768 Mb LPDDR3/DDR4
2.66
+45.4%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 45% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking772872
Place by popularity2447
Value for money0.770.08
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2Haswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (6 years old)1 June 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$706 $464

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 620 has 863% better value for money than HD Graphics 4600.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2420
Core clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors189 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6027.00
Floating-point performanceno data50 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 620 and HD Graphics 4600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno data64/128 Bit
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.66
+45.4%
HD Graphics 4600 1.83

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 45% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+45.1%
HD Graphics 4600 710

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 45% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 7330
+40.9%
HD Graphics 4600 5203

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 41% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 1744
+91.5%
HD Graphics 4600 911

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 92% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 620 1168
+83.8%
HD Graphics 4600 636

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 84% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

UHD Graphics 620 9324
+66.1%
HD Graphics 4600 5613

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 66% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

UHD Graphics 620 88746
+110%
HD Graphics 4600 42243

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 110% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

UHD Graphics 620 19
+33.8%
HD Graphics 4600 14

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms HD Graphics 4600 by 34% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18−21
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Full HD13
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
1440p16
+60%
10−12
−60%
4K8
+60%
5−6
−60%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+50%
4
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and HD Graphics 4600 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 28.6% faster than HD Graphics 4600

1080p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 18.2% faster than HD Graphics 4600

1440p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 60% faster than HD Graphics 4600

4K resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 60% faster than HD Graphics 4600

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 700% faster than the HD Graphics 4600.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics 4600 is 66.7% faster than the UHD Graphics 620.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is ahead in 35 tests (81%)
  • HD Graphics 4600 is ahead in 2 tests (5%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (14%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.66 1.83
Recency 1 September 2017 1 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The UHD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3750 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 2016 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.