UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs UHD Graphics 610

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 601$
Games supported 58%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory System Shared
  • Memory type DDR3/DDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 350
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating743750
Value for money1.34no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Kaby Lake (2016−2019)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT1Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 January 2019
(4 years old)
11 January 2021
(2 years old)
Current price$601 no data
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1224
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate12.60no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on UHD Graphics 610 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 610 2.16
+1.9%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.12
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

UHD Graphics 610 923
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458
+58%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by 58% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics 610 5277
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 8388
+59%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by 59% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics 610 616
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1043
+69.3%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by 69% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

UHD Graphics 610 664
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106
+66.7%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by 67% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−50%
12
+50%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−100%
8
+100%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 2.16 2.12
Recency 1 January 2019 11 January 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 12 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

and

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 322 ratings

Rate Intel UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 14 ratings

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.