Tegra K1 GPU vs UHD Graphics 610
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 984 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | GK20A |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 January 2019 (5 years ago) | 15 October 2014 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 951 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.60 | 7.608 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.2016 gflops | 0.3652 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | ES 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | - | 3.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2019 | 15 October 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 8 Watt |
UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 610 and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook card while Tegra K1 GPU is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
