Radeon RX 6600S vs UHD Graphics 610

Place in the ranking	914	175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.69	27.87
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT1	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 April 2018 (6 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1792
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	224.0
Floating-point processing power	0.1728 TFLOPS	7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	12	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 610 1.87

RX 6600S 31.97
+1610%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 610 728

RX 6600S 12444
+1609%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1525%

130−140
+1525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3000%	90−95 +3000%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%
Forza Horizon 4	8 −1775%	150−160 +1775%
Metro Exodus	4 −1925%	80−85 +1925%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8 −725%	65−70 +725%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3000%	90−95 +3000%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%
Dota 2	6 −1667%	100−110 +1667%
Far Cry 5	7 −1171%	85−90 +1171%
Fortnite	9−10 −1567%	150−160 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	10 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Grand Theft Auto V	3 −3433%	100−110 +3433%
Metro Exodus	2 −3950%	80−85 +3950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −863%	180−190 +863%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −725%	65−70 +725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
World of Tanks	35−40 −649%	270−280 +649%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −3000%	90−95 +3000%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%
Dota 2	11 −864%	100−110 +864%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −585%	85−90 +585%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −971%	150−160 +971%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −863%	180−190 +863%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	55−60
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1358%	170−180 +1358%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −3000%	30−35 +3000%
World of Tanks	12−14 −1633%	200−210 +1633%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1600%	100−110 +1600%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −5200%	50−55 +5200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Valorant	7−8 −1243%	90−95 +1243%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −1940%	100−110 +1940%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3500%	35−40 +3500%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Fortnite	0−1	40−45
Valorant	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 610 and RX 6600S compete in popular games:

RX 6600S is 1525% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 5200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6600S is ahead in 48 tests (79%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.87	31.97
Recency	3 April 2018	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	80 Watt

UHD Graphics 610 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6600S, on the other hand, has a 1609.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 610 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.